International Society of Arboriculture

Home Contact us Search Site

ISA LogoHeader image
                             

Back to Arborist News Menu

Arborist News


For many arborists, palms are a mystery. We aren't sure what to make of them. They don't fit easily into the basic categories we normally use for thinking and talking about trees. Arborists, in fact, sometimes question whether a palm is a tree at all.

The confusion is understandable and centers on the definition of the word "tree." Botanical authorities sometimes refer to palms as trees and, at other times, they do not. Dictionaries don't help much, either. Some dictionary definitions specifically include palms, while others exclude them. Most definitions, however, do not refer specifically to palms. Instead, they direct us to a series of other broadly defined terms that leave us scratching our heads and still wondering.

The problem is that the word "tree" is not a strict scientific term. Rather, it is an Old English word derived from a deep and varied history. Its primary meaning comes from common, everyday usage and, as such, is flexible and hard to pin down. Whether we refer to palms as trees or not is subjective. Either way, we'd be right.

To add to the confusion, many plants that are called palms and that look more or less like palms are, in reality, not palms. The most common example is the sago palm, which is not even closely related to true palms. Sago palm is a name given to certain species of cycad (Cycas spp.) which, despite their appearance, are more closely related to conifers than to palms. Other examples of such misnamed plants are dracaena palm (Cordyline australis), traveler's palm (Ravenala madagascariensis), and bottle palm (Nolina recurvata).

Most of what we know about palms, however, is not so confusing. In particular, our basic knowledge concerning the biology and structure of palms is clear, straightforward, and objective. So let's begin by looking at the place of palms in the plant kingdom and especially at their relationship to the kinds of trees we as arborists are more accustomed to working with.

There are two primary ways of looking at the biological relationship between palms and other kinds of trees. One is in terms of evolution and the system of plant classification that is based on evolution. The other is based on biological structure. First we consider evolution and classification.


** Arborist News **
February 2004
Send a Letter to the Editor

© International Society of Arboriculture 2009
P.O. Box 3129, Champaign, IL 61826
Email comments & questions to isa@isa-arbor.com