International Society of Arboriculture

Home Contact us Search Site

ISA LogoHeader image
                             

Back to Arborist News Menu

Arborist News


While reading about the history of psychology, I came across mention of an 1897 article on "dendro-psychoses" by J.O. Quantz. Because I had undertaken research on people's preferences for different tree forms (the acacia shape came out in top place), the title was intriguing. Dendro means tree and psychoses--well, I thought I knew its meaning, but found I was mistaken. In the 19th century, psychosis had one meaning--"state of mind." Based on that, the article title would become, in modern terminology, "The Origins of Human Attachment to Trees." Psychosis also had a second meaning in psychiatry, referring to serious mental disorder. That definition has remained and has obliterated the other, more benign definition.

Quantz was the first psychologist to use an evolutionary approach to understand human bonds to trees. His sources included anthropological studies of native peoples from around the world; interviews with children; and the works of poets, novelists, and lyricists.

The premise of Quantz's article was that the usefulness and beauty of trees are insufficient explanations for humankind's long and deep attachment; therefore, one must seek an internal (i.e., biological) explanation. He uses multiple, independent occurrences of the same myth among different people and among children as evidence suggesting a biological origin of the bond between humans and trees.

It is not necessary to accept this premise to appreciate the range and consistency of the examples Quantz provides. He proposes that "through the period of a few thousand generations, during which the surest means of safety from enemies was flight into the trees, there would gradually grow up in the human race an instinctive feeling for trees as natural protectors" (p. 501). This is very similar to the biophilia theory of Kellert and Wilson (1993), which maintains that many human preferences were shaped over millennia through interactions with features of the environment found helpful to the survival of the species during its early development. Through a process of gene-environment co-evolution, the multiple strands of environmental stimuli become part of culture. Culture allows a rapid adjustment to environmental changes through adaptations invented and transmitted without precise genetic prescription. Even when humans are removed from the stimuli originally provoking an emotional response, biophilia theory maintains that the connections remain in latent form and find expression as preferences and aversions.


** Arborist News **
February 2001
Send a Letter to the Editor

© International Society of Arboriculture 2009
P.O. Box 3129, Champaign, IL 61826
Email comments & questions to isa@isa-arbor.com